On Generalized Ajdukiewicz and Lambek Calculi and Grammars

نویسنده

  • Maciej Kandulski
چکیده

Investigations concerning the description of languages in terms of categorial grammar started with examining concatenation as the only syntactic operation. Type reduction systems such as associative Ajdukiewicz or Lambek calculi, which admit concatenation of types in the calculus (and consequently concatenation of words in a language) as the expression-forming operation, were proved defective. This is because the type reduction schemata they produce neither cover common linguistic phenomena of natural languages nor protect one from accepting some ill-formed strings of words. Diierent measures were put forward in order to make syntactic calculi more exible. They included adding new type reduction schemata, cf. Steedman 14], or changing the associative format of formulas of calculi: Lambek 12] introduced the nonassociative calculus, van Benthem 1] considered calculi with permutation, Buszkowski 4] discussed nonassociative calculi with functor markers. Linguistic evidence, however, called for such a shape of syntactic calculi in which there would exist diierent operators within one system. Ajdukiewicz and Lambek calculi founded on an algebra of arbitrary syntactic operations, here called the generalized calculi, were introduced by Buszkowski in 5], see also 2], and independently, with slightly another motivation under the name of multimodal systems, by Moortgat, see the survey 13]. Koo lowska-Gawiejnowicz in 11] has recently proved the completeness of the generalized Lambek calculus with respect to powerset residuated algebras. Categorial grammars based on associative syntactic calculi generate string languages, which can be evaluated from the point of view of the place they occupy in the Chomsky hierarchy. Grammars employing nonassociative calculi or nonassociative calculi with func-tor markers impose additional structure on generated strings, and produce, respectively, phrase languages and phrase languages with functor markers. There are diierent ways to characterize classes of such languages. One can compare classes of languages generated by grammars based on diierent syntactic calculi. It is also possible to characterize a class of languages by means of some degrees of complexity of elements belonging to them. Finally, each structured language can be deprived of (a part of) its structural components like functor markers or brackets, and such classes of partially structured languages can be examined as well. Details concerning generative power of categorial grammars and relevant issues are presented in Buszkowski's survey 6] and in original papers mentioned there. This paper deals with phrase languages generated by generalized Ajdukiewicz and Lambek categorial grammars. The calculi we will be concerned with can be viewed as 1

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Syntactic categories and types: Ajdukiewicz and modern categorial grammars

This essay confronts Ajdukiewicz’s approach to syntactic categories with modern categorial grammars, mainly AB-grammars (basic categorial grammars) and Lambek grammars, i.e. categorial grammars based on different versions of the Lambek calculus.

متن کامل

Conjoinability and unification in Lambek categorial grammars

Recently, learning algorithms in Gold’s model have been proposed for some particular classes of classical categorial grammars [Kan98]. We are interested here in learning Lambek categorial grammars. In general grammatical inference uses unification and substitution. In the context of Lambek categorial grammars it seems appropriate to incorporate an operation on types based both on deduction (Lam...

متن کامل

k-Valued non-associative Lambek grammars are learnable from generalized functor-argument structures

This paper is concerned with learning categorial grammars from positive examples in the model of Gold. Functor-argument structures (written FA) are usual syntactical decompositions of sentences in sub-components distinguishing the functional parts from the argument parts defined in the case of classical categorial grammars also known as AB-grammars. In the case of non-associative type-logical g...

متن کامل

Lambek Calculus and Formal Grammars

The question about the position of categorial grammars in the Chomsky hierarchy arose in late 1950s and early 1960s. In 1960 Bar-Hillel, Gaifman, and Shamir [1] proved that a formal language can be generated by some basic categorial grammar if and only if the language is context-free. They conjectured (see also [7]) that the same holds for Lambek grammars, i. e., for categorial grammars based o...

متن کامل

Book Review: Categorial Grammar: Logical Syntax, Semantics, and Processing by Glyn V. Morrill

The title of this book, Categorial Grammar: Logical Syntax, Semantics, and Processing, indicates that this will be a book about categorial grammar. In the preface, however, several strains of categorial grammar are discussed, including combinatory categorial grammar (Steedman 2000), pregroup grammar (Lambek 1999), and abstract categorial grammar (de Groote 2001), and it is clarified that the bo...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Fundam. Inform.

دوره 30  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1997